HMRC says care industry VAT grouping is “tax avoidance”
HMRC is warning that setting up VAT groups in the care industry to reclaim VAT on what would otherwise be exempt supplies is tax avoidance. What’s the full story?

HMRC says that it considers the structuring of VAT groups within the care industry to gain a tax advantage to be tax avoidance. State-regulated care providers registered with the Care Quality Commission supplying welfare services are exempt from VAT. This means that VAT is not charged on the provision of care services to the Local Authority and consequently, VAT cannot be recovered on any costs associated with the supply of those services.
The structuring involves the insertion of a company that is not regulated, to form a VAT group and act as a “middleman” between the regulated company and the local authority. VAT is then charged by the new company and recovered on costs. While this may seem like a niche area, it is relatively common planning in practice.
HMRC is launching a programme to review all instances where this avoidance arrangement is in place. Further information can be found in Spotlight 70, which explains that any powers used will only take effect once the investigation is complete. This means that where this specific arrangement is in place HMRC will not seek to claim tax back from any earlier period. Users of such arrangements should seek independent professional advice in the first instance.
Related Topics
-
Delay salary to save tax
As a company owner manager, you decide when to take income from your business. If that’s your only source of income, tax planning is relatively simple but it’s trickier if you have other sources. What’s the best strategy to improve tax efficiency?
-
Loan written off: are you in HMRC’s crosshairs?
HMRC is writing to directors that took a loan from their company that was later written off or released. What should you do if you receive a letter?
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?